1:1 This blog is an further elucidated edit of a
blog posted on January 22, 2011 at 4:00 pm to
www.facebook.com/craig.nelson.hamilton
1:2 The original title of the Facebook note was,
“Trashing Quantum Physics (Chabad) AND On the Finite Universe (Fresh Air)”
1:3 This blog contains some of my collected
comments at www.chabad.org and in addition, where I feel it
is needed further elucidation is given to the comments. The website below in this blog post contains
the original comments before they were posted as a note on Facebook.
1:4 Most popular names in science, philosophy,
and what not have some truth, as in what is there in the universe that can’t be
redeemed? Honestly, I don’t want to know. There is a lot of sifting to do
through the various ideas academia presents to its students, but there is
usually something there. For example, I am completely against the popularity of
quantum physics. When I first write this
note, there were only a few survivors in academia that believed in the universe
as the way Einstein described it, and at some time there may be more. However, that is not to say that there are no
uses for the study of quantum physics.
One person’s trash is another’s treasure. The tyranny of the exactness
of this foolish mathematical religion is stupid. In that range, it is hard to
tell what influences what. With the rout use of the scientific method, this
foolish religion would most likely never have occurred. Eventually, either the
math crumbles in exactness or the experimenter realizes the spiritual forces,
such as the spirit of wind, that allow these experiments to occur, with or without
the scientific method.
1:5 Quantum physics is essentially variable
matrix reality, which easily suffices to create science fiction. It is the variable nature of quantum reality
that allows me to associate the idea of quantum physics with science fiction. Usually, good science fiction is based in
fact, but quantum physics is not based in fact even though it may help some
people discover facts. For example, for
someone who has the type of mind that essentially turns logic into an idol,
quantum physics may help him or her understand how the universe works in an
oversimplified way.
1:6 One example of the way quantum physics can be
used to generate science fiction is that there are no straight lines in biology
and everything else for that matter, and quantum physics uses the Cartesian
plan. In a few other blogs, such as The Physics of the Holy of Holies, and
chapter 1 of, “Unlocking the Secrets of the Gsus Chord,” this is discussed by
me. That is, quantum physics makes the
universe out to be a matrix, referring to the way the term is typically used in
college level linear algebra, where a matrix is essentially a collection of
adjacent squares or boxes, etc, depending on the number Cartesian dimensions
that are considered. In quantum physics,
the things that can happen in these boxes are essentially completely variable,
and thus unrealistic, and lacking understanding. In quantum physics, once the Cartesian plane
is accepted as a Gd, albeit a false Gd or what religion defines as an idol,
then for those that have accepted a false Gd, quantum physics can help put them
back on the pathway to reality, but the problem is that via quantum physics one
becomes capable of generating an infinite number of problems, such that when
one solves one problem, another problem presents itself. Thus, if you are capable of putting it down,
quantum physics can be useful in ideas such as computers, where the traditional
monitor has a grid of pixels, which is comparable to the adjacent boxes of a
matrix. Thus, as pixels are capable of
being made to produce various colors or lack thereof, and the way movement is
achieve on a monitor which also may be called a television, may also be
described in this way. If one gets
caught up in the religion, then the world becomes increasingly absurd, but if
one keeps the idea of matrices to its more simple form, such as the dimensions
of a television, and the colors of pixels, then this is religion may be useful
for those who have unfortunately committed the idea of a matrix as their idea
of Gd.
1:7 Everything at the minute level becomes
subject to trivial electromagnetic mixing currents, which might be called
spiritual forces; inclusive of an idea such as whether or not a person, place
or thing is blessed. That is, having a GPS, which uses quantum physics, is not
enough. It also has to work for you. If there is not enough resistance in
circuit between you and the GPS, it is likely to collapse, getting you nowhere. The problem with the idea of GPS, is that if
a student of matrices meets a physics professor that tries to describe how one
of these boxes can collapse and become a black hole, it becomes a problem that
is only possible to be rationalized through Einstein’s electromagnetic
understanding of the universe, as opposed to the increasing absurdity that
results with further study of the religion of quantum physics.
1:8 The "straight lines" I mention in
verse 6 are literal. The only place a straight line actually exists is in
imagination. They, straight lines, can also be calculated with the mathematical
formula y = mx + b, but they aren't realistic.
For example, one can’t draw a line that is completely straight, which is
sufficiently described by the concept of Brownian motion, such that the
discipline of quantum physics becomes unnecessary.
1:9 If a true straight line exists in this
universe, then it is most certainly a rarity.
That is, when a straight line exists in imagination, it may be
considered that imagination is a part of the universe where the concept of a
straight line may exist.
1:10 In further exploration of the straight line
fallacy, the instance a bow and arrow string may be used, and in verse 10, this
verse, I define a bow and arrow. The
string is a taunt high tension wire that is a part of a bow designed for
shooting arrows. For example, native
Americans, referring to the people who inhabited the Americas and where
originally thought to be Indians used bows to shoot arrows when hunting. Also, bows and arrows were used often in
warfare in the middle ages, such that they are commonly used in movies to
describe Medieval warfare. Thus, the bow
and arrow is a very ubiquitous idea, and I am unsure where the idea began. Bows and arrows may be as old as the cavemen
who first picked up rocks.
1:11 The string of a bow and arrow, when pulled
tight is a straight line, no? No, it is not a straight line because it is
subject to density/buoyancy. That is, because the string is a more dense liquid,
then air, also a liquid, the string becomes curved, as part of it sinks more
than other parts through thermodynamics, which in the past used to be described
by gravity. That is, the ideas of
density and buoyancy fully describe gravity, such that Einstein’s gravity
formula is not needed. As a result,
bowing of the string occurs when the sting is relatively subjected to what is
known as gravity if it is not held perpendicular to the earth. It should strike any person that does not
believe in the matrices, god, that absolute perpendicularity to the earth is
impossible due to the irregular curvature of the earth’s surface, such as
hills, valleys, and that which has slope, referring to slope that roughly
capable of being described through the equality of mathematical functions, such
as parabolas. In addition, since string
is a finite material, it can’t be pulled infinitely taunt before breaking, such
that it can overcome the impossibility of being absolutely perpendicular to the
earth’s gravitation field, where gravity is defined in the Newtonian sense, as
an idea that occurred to him when he was sitting under an apple tree and an
apple fell on his head. And, as the
string is pulled more taunt it becomes straighter, but total straightness is
impossible to achieve because of the thermodynamics of electromagnetism.
1:12 It is also worthy to note that I also
disagree when science calls air a gas.
Since fish breath in water, and humans breath in air, it is not that
there is a difference between a gas and a liquid, it is more that in the case
of animals oxygen may be extracted from various media through different
biological organs. Air is a liquid in that like a liquid it can be poured, and
that pouring may be described by density and buoyancy.
1:13 Throw out gravity too. That is what gets
people into the mess of the religion of quantum physics, as gravity is the
theory by which quantum physics is derived.
Without gravity, which has already been disproved, quantum physics has
no basis by which to generate its increasingly absurd mathematics.
1:14 Albert Einstein openly stated that he was
unhappy with his theory of gravity when he made it, thinking it fallible.
1:15 The evidence of the electromagnetic mixing
currents may be observed by simply pouring water through a funnel. The swirl is
an elaborate pattern that is a mixing current. The swirl is an electrical
current. It is not quantum indeterminacy that causes the results of quantum
physics experiments, but complex electromagnetic mixing current. This may be thought of conceptual as the ways
which the wind blows on a windy day.
That is, the ways which the wind blows are complex patterns, and are not
due to randomness only.
1:16 I am not the only one that criticized
gravity. Einstein criticized his own theory. He sought to disprove it because
thought it was wrong. If you consider him to be anybody, know that that he was
as important to humanities learning of the concepts of the universe as say,
Charles Darwin or Nicolai Tesla. That
is, his criticisms of his own theory should be taken seriously, especially
because he was able to generate great respect among his peers in the field,
exclusive of those that simply follow the crowd simply for its own sake because
they accept that someone knows better than them, such that he or she is
infallible.
1:17 The point of the straight line argument was
to show you that mathematical representations are not even close to full proof.
It is impossible to use math to disprove math, as calculus 101, meaning a
college level class that includes limits and derivatives, etc, is considered to
be math, where math is subject to the inconsistencies of logic.
1:18 Perhaps, it is because we humans have DNA,
which may be described by a four letter alphabet (A, T, G, and C) that we can
understand the concept of a straight line or math in imagination. It takes an alphabet
or two to understand math, such as the English alphabet and numerals. That is, math relies on proofs which use
language and numerals. The concept of a straight line arises from a
discontinuous mind, which may be possible for the human consciousness to fathom
because there are gaps between neurons that are traversed by neurotransmitters,
so we think. That is that the DNA
alphabet may give us the concrete chemicals we need in order to understand what
a straight line is, and other things such as whether or not all three points of
a triangle are mathematically required to be included or not included when
describing a triangle, which may be described by three linear functions that
overlap each other. The overlapping of
points of linear functions may be represented as differences in color on
televisions, of which some computers are capable of generating matrices with
millions of colors, or more, but the original color monitors only consisted of
256 colors, where black and white monitors are described as something different
than 256 colors, though various shades of grey are considered to be colors. However, a problem with matrices is that
though a computer may be capable of generating, say 256 colors, the nature of
these colors may be calibrated infinitely to produce more accurate image
representations.
1:19 Water pouring through a funnel is an
electrical current though it does not show up on our electrical bills from
companies that supply power. A reason
that water pouring through a funnel may be described through an electrical
current is that water is a bent molecule where negative charge collects near
the oxygen atom of the water molecule, such that it is negative near the middle
of the molecule and positive at the ends at the polar ends. Water is most certainly charged. Water's
properties, such as the swirl when you pour it through a funnel arise because
of charge, which I have crudely described through commonly known ideas taught
in chemistry, such as the way to draw representations of compounds on paper.
1:20 Do not ask me to give a firm mathematical
foundation where the very nature of the foundation of quantum physics, the one
you believe (believed?), because while it is rooted in mathematics, is not firm
and is doublethink, such that it’s contradictions collapse upon inspection.
1:21 Reasonably, if the nature of quantum physics
is rooted in mathematics, then mathematics can’t be a firm foundation as math
has inconsistencies and though they are minute, that is precisely the reason
why. That is, the discipline of quantum
physics attempts to describe matter, where it is concluded that the smaller the
size of a unit of matter, the more absurdly it behaves. However, this behavior in reality is not
absurd, as smaller particles of matter are more easily influenced by various
electromagnetic mixing currents, which are comparable to the ways which a speck
of dust blows in a hurricane. That is
the speck of dust may appear to behave absurdly, but upon further inspection
the reason why it behaved this way was because it was blowing in the wind.
1:22 Albert Einstein carelessly gave quantum
physics his blessing at first, without giving it much thought, but then he
recanted and tried to disprove it. The following is written on the subject, “One
of the few perceptive readers of Planck’s early quantum theory papers was the
junior patent examiner in Bern, Albert Einstein. To Einstein, the postulate of
the energy elements was vivid and real, if appalling, “as if the ground had
been pulled from under one, with no firm foundation seen anywhere upon which
one could have built.” As it happened, the search for a “firm foundation”
occupied Einstein for the rest of his life.” - William H. Cropper
1:22 “Everything in the quantum world occurs at
random and there is no direct cause for quantum events.” – Roland Omnes
Does
it seem that Einstein’s trying to contradict this by his saying, “God does not
play dice?” It seems to me that
Einstein’s statement contradicts Roland Omnes, and his teaching on quantum
physics which came to be accepted. In my
own opinion, parts of matter are variable, but that Gd and that this leaves Gd
a way into the universe, such that He may operate upon it through manipulating
the universe, such that His Torah that He gave to Moses at Mount Sinai are made
to be truth.
1:23 Search the New York Times database for the
word, "Gravity." You will come up with at least four articles that
question it. The 2010 article in the New
York Times, which is possibly the most important newspaper in the nation of the
United States of America, says that based upon the calculations of Stephen
Hawking, the idea of gravity is actually describable as thermodynamics.
1:24 As I have stated before, quantum physics
originated from Einstein’s theory of gravity, and the New York Times article mentioned
in verse 23 grossly disproves this equation, thus removing the very
fundamentals of the discipline of quantum physics.
1:25 From
NPR’s various Facebook pages, “Fresh Air with Terry Gross
Time to put on your thinking caps folks. On Monday,
we're going to dive deeply into the possibility that parallel universes exist.
Your homework: study and understand string theory, by Monday morning. Oh, who
am I kidding? Physicist Brian Greene is going to walk us through what he
studies, what it means, and why it could mean parallel universes exist.”
1:25 My first
comment to verse 25:
The universe is finite. Go into a room. Shut off the
lights. It is dark. At nighttime we see that it is dark. Given that, what
reason do we have to believe that the universe is not contained? Matter darks
the universe, according to the philosopher, my only known son, Alexander Joseph
Hamilton. Grey matter is the matter that is reflecting light. The lights in the
sky are probably links to other universes.
However, on most nights we see some stars, such that at night there is
not humanely observable total darkness.
That is, within all matter, even space, there is essentially a spark of
light, but that the concept of the darkest black hole is something which light
can’t escape from. Thus, there is a such
a thing as a border, though this border may not be described by matrices,
gravity, or quantum physics, where parallel universes are something that was
conceived of through quantum physics.
1:25 My
Second Comment to verse 25:
More on the same subject. Sometimes we see what is
outside our eye, while sometimes we see inwards, thought, our mind's eye. We
see both waves of darkness and waves of light and their intermediates. When we see
a star what we are seeing is probably a portal to the inside and the outside,
in the same way that when we see an eye, what we are seeing is a portal to the
inside and outside. Both light and darkness are portals made up of
electromagnetic mixing currents, which are ox/redox reactions. Matter emits darkness. Light receives darkness. There are also other ways of describing this,
which are mentioned in my note Chapter 1 Secrets of the Gsus Chord.
1:26 I
discuss verse 25 elsewhere on the internet, which I intend to post on this
particular blog at some time in the future.
