Noah Noach Noahide Noachide Craig Hamilton Abrahamic Religions Sandwich, MA Jewish Moshiach Chabad Judaism Jew evolution creation mysticism Kabballah Tanya Torah 613 Mishneh Torah Ethics of the Fathers Pirkei Avot Muslim Qur'an Islam Ishmael Mohammed British Israelism Zerahites Zerah Zeus Perez Poseidon idolatry Christian idol House of David Messiah Moshiach Mashiach Kabbalah Esau Edom Edomites middle ages medieval Maimonides Rashi The Lubavitcher Rebbe Sabbath Shabbat Talmud
Thursday, October 25, 2012
Honest Prayers for the Victory of Mitt Romney
I'm praying for the victory of Mitt Romney. I won't say that I think he is the
perfect candidate. For example, I don't like his running mate, all the while
realising that his choice is wise. I have a general distaste for religious
conservatives.
Sunday, October 14, 2012
5th Zerah: Adam's Lineage; From the Bible to The Royal House of Troy to The Line from Zerah to King Alfred “the Great”
The line from Adam to Noah is very
well known because it is in the Bible, Christian Bibles, Jewish Bibles, and
this literature is sacred even to Islam.
In the Bible, Noah is primarily know for being the person who built an
Ark, such that when a massive flood came, Noah was saved, and the rest of
humanity drowned. In the Bible, Noah is
the 10th generation where Adam is the first generation. So, I am starting with a 10 next to Noah.
10. Noah
11. Shem
Several different sacred texts
include a flood story in their history.
In fact, this story is not just in Hebrew literature, but also Greek,
Roman, Norse and British legend contain a flood story. For example Shem, the son of Noah is listed
in the sacred British text, the Anglo Saxon Chronicle as, Sem, and in other
places Shem is called Sceaf.
Shem is where the word Semite comes
from. Thus, in this lineage, I am
establishing that the British Kings and the ancestors to these kings where of
Semitic origin.
12.
Arpachshad
The line from Noah to Abraham is
also in the Bible, but I will list it anyway.
13.
Shelah
14.
Eber
Eber means Hebrew. Thus, Eber is thought to be the first Hebrew
patriarch.
15.
Peleg
16.
Reu
17.
Serug
18.
Nahor
19.
Terah
20.
Abraham
Among Jews, Abraham is often called
the first Jew though the word Jew derives from the Israelite tribe of
Judah. This is somewhat confusing. However, Abraham is thought to be the father
of monotheism, and in addition, Abraham is well known for his institution of
the practice of circumcision, which is a practice that like Jews, the British
are known to circumcise their males.
However, I do understand that this is arguable because certain Orthodox
Jews believe that the circumcision of the Brits, and other peoples are
invalidated for various reasons.
21.
Isaac
22.
Jacob who became Israel
In mythology, the patriarch Jacob is
known as SATURNUS OF KRIT, where Krit is the Island of Crete. The historians Eusebius
and Tacitus (see his book Histories 5:2) connect Saturn, Crete and Israel. In fact, among the English Saturday, is
Saturn's Day, where Saturday is the Israelite Sabbath.
22. Judah
JUPITER
in Persian mythology is Judah. In other
mythology, Judah is Jove. For example, in
the Iliad, Jove had a ruler's scepter.
This scepter is mentioned in [Genesis 49:10]. In the mythology, this scepter was made by
Vulcan.
23. Zerah is the son of Judah in the book of
Genesis. The word Zerah in Hebrew means,
“Strange worship,” such that it is no wonder why such odd religious
associations, such as polytheism are associated with this clan of Judah. While Jupiter of the Persian Empire mean
Judah, Zeus of the Greek empire meant Zerah.
Zeus came to be associated lightning bolts, and that was the priestly
Zerahites, while in other circles Zeus the Olympiad referred to Zerah, as he,
Zerah is mentioned first in the Bible as an Edomite, where being an Olympiad
may be thought of as Edomite like behavior.
I
understand that this literature puts the Israelite Exodus from Egypt at an
impossible date, according to the Orthodox calendar, but I am pretty sure that
before the age of 1,000 BCE the orthodox calendar is in fact wrong. I have discussed this in other blogs.
24. Mahol
1
Kings 5:11 “Darda the son of Mahol”
25. Darda [Chronicles], Dara, is the son of Zeus
in the Iliad, where he is called the phonetically similar Dardanus in the
Iliad.
True
to the scepter and the prophecy of Israel that Judah would rule, Darda founded
The Royal House of Troy and Trojan race).
26. ERICHHONIUS [Iliad]
Thus,
for the continuation of the lineage of Darda, I turn to other sacred lineage,
as the Bible stops with Darda, while the semi-legendary mythologies continue
the lineage.
26. TROS [Iliad]
27. Laomedon [Iliad]
28. Tithonus (mentioned in THE TROJAN WOMEN by
EURIPIDES)
29. Memnon [mentioned in Theogony by Hesiod]
30. Priam of Troy [Iliad, Woden (Odin I) John D.
Keyser]
31. Troan m. Munon, Mennon, Memnon
The
Icelandic Langfedgatal and the Younger Edda continue this lineage as a
migration to the north and the birth of Thor or Tror.
32. Thor son of Odin/Priam
Like
Saturn’s Day, or Saturday, Thor was given a day of week Thursday. Also, his hammer may be associated with the
property of resonance in science.
33. Loridi
34. Hloritha
35. Einridi
36. Einrid
37. Vingethor
28. Moda (Hebrew connection to Norse because moda
is a Hebrew word.)
29. Magi
This
name brings a connection of the Zoroastrian
religion with this lineage. Most
importantly, it is a Chaldean connection to Norse, where the Chaldeans are
Hebrews. Magi is mentioned in the
Christian Bible, and I believe it is at this point that there is possibly a
migration to the north, and the so called gospel says that the Magi took a
different root home, and in fact, I suggest that they never returned.
Sceaf,
Seskef, Odin II = Sheaf of grain connection to Leviticus 23:9-14
30. Bedwig
This
lineage continues below as listed. There
are several different sources for this lineage through the Dark Ages, so it is
hard to say which one is correct.
However, the lineages do seem to indicate the pattern mentioned roughly
below. Also, when I wrote this, I
definitely know that there may have been omissions to this genealogy, but it is
still thought that the general list is about as close as possible that can be
achieved.
31. Hwala
32. Hathra
33. Athra
34. Itermon
35. Itermann
36. Heremod or maybe Heremot
37. Sceldwa or maybe Scealdna
38. Beaw or maybe Beaf
Beowulf
is a legendary book where this person is the central character.
39. Taetwa
40. Eatus
41. Geata
42. Godulf
43. Godwulf
44. Finn
45. Frithuwulf
46. Frealaf
47.
Voden, Oden, or Woden (Odin III)
48. Bældæg
49. Brond
50. Gewis
51. Elesa
52. Cerdic, King of Wessex
53. Cynric, King of Wessex
54. Ceawlin, King of Wessex
55. Cuthwine
56. Cuthwulf
57. Ceolwald
58. Cenred
59. Ingild
60. Eoppa
61. Eafa
62. Ealhmund
63. Subregulus of Kent
64. Ecgbeorht, King of Wessex
65. Æðelwulf, King of Wessex
66. Ælfræd “the Great”
From
this point on the ancestry is well documented, and needs no further mention
here.
***** The Lion, The Witch and The Wardrobe by C.S. Lewis – Narnia Is as Fantastic as Jesus
I love how C.S. Lewis posits the trilemma of Mere Christianity,
perhaps C.S. Lewis’s most famous apologetic work, to also support the idea that
Narnia exists.
Lucy must either be a liar, mad, or telling the truth that
Narnia is real in the same way that in Mere Christianity Lewis posits that
Jesus must be Lord, liar or lunatic. Clearly, there are more
possibilities than these with regard to Jesus, lest we believe every fantasy
our children tell us.
This writing is very much secretly evangelistic, but probably
not in a way most people would expect. I feel when an evangelist presents
me with the Jesus story, and declares something like that Jesus must be Lord,
liar or lunatic, it is not Jesus whom I am passing judgment upon, but the
witness of a fairytale presented to me. It is thus not Jesus that must be
Lord, liar or lunatic, but the person or author that presents Jesus to me that
is probably liar, lunatic or telling the truth. But, as I believe happens
in the case of the Jesus story, most people that believe in fairy tales are
just honestly mistaken about their tale. That is, they are neither
telling the truth, lying, or insane, but that they are just plain honestly
mistaken. When someone tells me that if
I don’t believe in a fairytale, such that my soul depends on it in order to
escape eternal punishment, I won’t sell my soul to believe in Jesus anymore
than I would subscribe to the idea that Narnia is a real place. Strangely, C.S. Lewis seems to support that
idea as upright, such that entering the fantastic world of Jesus and
Christianity, even if it be lies, is still ideal to the alternative of denying
Christian religious fantasies.
Of course, Jesus was a real person, but anything beyond that is
anyone’s guess, and as mysterious as Narnia itself. Three major religions
have three stories about Jesus that are very much in conflict.
Christianity says that Jesus is Lord. Judaism says that Jesus was the
antichrist. And, Islam says that Jesus was the humblest prophet, but not
as great as Mohammed. Therefore, what is to be made of this man’s story
is anybody’s guess. Absurdly, most Christians say that this decision is
central going to either heaven or hell in the afterlife. That much I am unable to accept.
* The Moral Landscape: How Science Can Determine Human Values by Sam Harris - Terrible
(Stopped reading this pile of dung.) – This book gets one star
for inspiring me to criticize it. In summary, the idea is to evaluate
ethics with science. First, to evaluate the data ethical experiments
would give us would result in a mound of data so gloppy that one could only
hope to find the needle in the haystack that is the truth. Second, moral
experiments are ethically wrong. You can’t ask people to do something
immoral and another group to do something moral to see if what we think is
moral is in fact moral. How ridiculous! And, third, should we even
trust such findings? That is, we learn about the moral landscape as we
gather knowledge in life naturally. There is no need to have a scientific
journal of moral findings. One mistake in a journal article would call
the entire system into account. We learn about such ethical studies
already by experience, age, and in order to receive moral data, we have to trust
the source. This means that there could be no science, meaning the
scientific method, in the experiment because in order to trust the results, we
have to trust the experimenter, and what reasonable person is going to trust an
experimenter that asks people to do something that is immoral! This idea
has the same mentality as Nazi experiments during the Holocaust, as by its very
nature it creates human guinea pigs. Lastly, if we understand the history
of evolution, then we already know the answers to all the moral
questions. Without writing a book on the subject, I will just refer you
to Richard Dawkins whom addresses the subject of ethics in biology in his book,
“The Selfish Gene.”
This book is about the moral landscape. I believe
landscaping – for example mowing lawns but generally not rearranging rocks - is
immoral. I probably need to give a dissertation on that claim, but I
won’t. I will leave it that at bare minimum, he is referring to mowing
lawns. What about me, aren’t I carving a moral landscape as I write
this. Well um, actually, I am carving rocks, not trees. This is
written to a magnetic recording device, not on paper.
Though I have done some landscaping, and sometimes continue to
do so, I believe that it is immoral. It helps pay the bills, and I only
do it regrettably if someone gives me something to do it. Generally, I
would prefer to do something else for reward, and some things I do I believe
are good with no expectation of reward.
I do not like the author’s suggestion that the truth is open to
analysis. The truth is the truth. What is good is good.
Either you know what is good, or you don’t. Otherwise you learn what is
good, or you don’t. Some people don’t know what is good that much I
understand. Some people know what is good and don’t do it. Some
people know the truth and do the wrong thing. Some people know the truth
and cling to it. Some people know the truth and are moderate about it,
sometimes choosing to do good, sometimes choosing to do evil. Analyze
that in an already massive multivariable experiment!
Let’s imagine Sam Harris’ idea in practice. The experiment
will be to evaluate if making species extinct is a good thing or a bad thing,
or neutral. Group A will attempt to make several species extinct.
Group B will try to make new species. And, as a control, Group C will
neither try to make species extinct, nor make new species. How absurd to
think Group C is a control! What can we expect to find? If Group A
has a great amount of sociopaths in it, then they will report, making species
extinct results in the most blessed feeling imaginable, maybe. It will
probably depend on the people involved and the wording of the experiment
regarding extinction. What if the people entering the experiment think
that they will only be making species extinct such as the good for nothing
tapeworm? Do we differentiate between tapeworms and butterflies?
Doctors might enter this group to provide us with cures! If Group B is
able make some new species, we are left with an ethical conundrum. Have
they made pathogens, dinosaurs, house pets, and/or maybe food? The
control, Group C’s response might only be relative to the season of the year,
where dark or cold seasons of the year often result in depression. Then,
we would have to add an experiment on top of it all to see whether or not it is
good to feel good or if it better to feel terrible. Then, we are probably
likely to conclude that it is good to feel good when doing some things, but
that it is good to feel bad when doing others. But, then we might
consider intent, and even accidents. One conundrum leads to
another. The result of the original experiment is that the experimenters
talked themselves into a pretzel and probably never found out whether or not it
is good to make species extinct. As for me, if tapeworms become extinct,
I won’t fret, and if you make a new species of butterfly that is probably a
good thing. I’m sure some people would disagree with me. I won’t
say, let’s not pretend that we know what is ethical though because some of us
don’t.
Saturday, October 13, 2012
1st Jehovah's Witness: On the 613 Commandments of Torah - Unchanging Means Unchanging
The Gd that destroyed the earth, drowning the souls of the
wicked in the time of Noah is the same God as He has always been.
Malachi Chapter 3 (6) For
I YHWH change not; and ye, O sons of Jacob, are not consumed. Tanach (Hebrew Scriptures) Corrected JPS 1917 Translation
Fools I beseech thee not to act without care, and to not deem
any part of the Bible dated, such that you proudly defend your sins and
lawlessness.
I have recently been in discussion
over religion with someone who is a Jehovah’s Witness. For the most part it seemed like that we had
a lot in common, but it was also said that Jehovah’s Witnesses do not observe
Shabbat, and that really they don’t take the 613 commandments of the Bible
seriously for all I could see. That
much, I found in agreement with what is said about gentiles, but then it was
said that these are not the, “Gentile times,” which is sort of confusion, because
they say it has been like this since 1914.
They also say that Jesus came back to the earth in Spirit during that
time, but I am pretty sure that it was not this event in 1914 that was special,
but actually the beginning of the Second Industrial Revolution. I hope that wasn’t too confusing.
It does seem that we, the Jehovah’s
witness and I do share several things in common, mainly monotheism. I had never before heard of a Christian that
did not believe Jesus is a deity. That
was a belief that I never fully accepted when I was seeking to learn about
Gd. That horrible belief that Jesus it
Gd that is taught in all the other Christian denominations that I know of. So far as it concerns me, Abraham is the
father of all monotheistic religions, and he loved both of his sons Ishmael,
and Isaac, as any father would, and probably not favoring one over the
other.
So, you may wonder; what is my story? What religion am I? I, myself, can’t say that I am a Jew, but
that is only in the way a happy man may or may not be gay. The Jews whom I believe are the Shelahites
and the Perezites are the two main branches of Judaism that are accepted as
Jews, and though I do believe I descend from Judah, my ancestors fell away as
kings in the House of Troy, and then the Persian Empire, such that they have
pretty much been in power for the at least the last 3,000 years, practicing
strange worship. In fact, in the
tractate Zerah of the Talmud, the word zerah actually means, “Strange worship.” Since the ancestry of Zerah is my history, I
do believe myself to be a Zerahite.
As for the Jehovah’s Witnesses, they
do seem to take their religion seriously.
However, I am completely perplexed why they don’t follow all of the
Torah’s commands. For example, in the
book I was given, and the movie I saw, the men are all clean shaven.
I plea to Gd for the redemption of Israel, such that it's lost may become found, and the lost tribes found, and regathered.
Why do so many doubt the sovereignty of the Lord God. He destroyed all people except for the 8 on the ark. Even if you don't believe this story, if you research human ancestry there once was a time when humanity was mostly destroyed except for a theoretical 80 people. Why do people transgress the Sabbath so proudly? Why do people deny the 613 commands in Torah and the curses of transgression! Should we not fear a Gd who presides over the death of millions? What makes people so over confident when they transgress the Law warming the hot coals of hell?!
I plea to Gd for the redemption of Israel, such that it's lost may become found, and the lost tribes found, and regathered.
Why do so many doubt the sovereignty of the Lord God. He destroyed all people except for the 8 on the ark. Even if you don't believe this story, if you research human ancestry there once was a time when humanity was mostly destroyed except for a theoretical 80 people. Why do people transgress the Sabbath so proudly? Why do people deny the 613 commands in Torah and the curses of transgression! Should we not fear a Gd who presides over the death of millions? What makes people so over confident when they transgress the Law warming the hot coals of hell?!
Wednesday, October 10, 2012
Hope for the Lost
My wish is that more people would wake up to the sovereignty of the Lord. Too many have shaken their fists in anger at Gd. Too many have judged Gd, and deemed that reality is controlled by an evil one or that because of holocaust they believe god to be weak in power. They go to their graves in hideous drama.
It is sad that many worship a Gd that is constantly fails them, bringing pain. The Torah couldn't make it any clearer that our condition is reflective of our relationship with Gd or lack thereof. It is sad to read the writings of people that have severed the strings that bind us with each other and our maker.
It is sad that many worship a Gd that is constantly fails them, bringing pain. The Torah couldn't make it any clearer that our condition is reflective of our relationship with Gd or lack thereof. It is sad to read the writings of people that have severed the strings that bind us with each other and our maker.
Tuesday, October 9, 2012
A Reply to an Atrocity Reported on by Aayan Hirsi Ali, Head of AHA Foundation
"
The AHA Foundation
14-year-old Malala, a Pakistani peace prize winner, was shot in the head today on her school bus for her activism fighting for the right for girls to be educated in Pakistan. The Taliban have claimed responsibility. She is currently fighting for her life in the hospital
At the AHA Foundation, we believe that women and girls everywhere, of all cultures, merit access to education and basic human rights.
We're rooting for you, Malala!
http://shelbyknox.com/2012/10/ 09/ where-are-the-global-girl-activ ists/
"
I don't believe this actually has anything to do with religion. If you look that the modern thinking behind Gobekli Tepi it is thought that the urge to be religious is the foundation of civilization, and that the desire to worship God wasn't as a trade that appeared as some sort of job in the movement toward civilization. What I am getting at is that most people think religion is about doing what is good, and because most of us believe murder is wrong in our hearts, the urge to worship Gd is mostly a good thing, and not only that, but that the desire to worship causes the majority to do good. It is unfortunate though that some people, mostly children themselves, have such a hard time wrestling with what is true and what is good, that in a society of children, as Packistan is, there is more likely to be tragedies that happen as a result of not having a population of elders that can help drive society to do better. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/G%C3%B6bekli_Tepe
Sunday, October 7, 2012
I love the book of Deuteronomy.
Perhaps, no other Bible
book makes it so clear that peril will fall to those who do not follow the Lord
God’s commands. The meaning of our state
of existence is entirely described by Deuteronomy. God is sovereign. If we prosper, then He is the reason we
prosper. If we struggle, then He too is
the reason why we struggle, yet usually most of us receive some grace, such
that even if we do sin, the Lord God may overlook it.
I know for a fact that
this very idea makes certain people such as atheists and Christians mad, but I
hope that when Gd shows them their punishments they will see in their souls why
they struggle. Call this the evil of Gd
if you will, but vengeance belongs to the Lord should one violate the commands
he has given to us.
I think what most people are
used to is the blessing of grace in their life.
Many people do not fear the Lord and the consequences for failing to
keep all of his commands because they are used to a life of grace. True, the Lord is gracious, but why take
advantage of that? Why do evil in any way
if the Lord God sees all? Also, the
Bible talks of the evil of Gd with respect to King Saul. Why invite the Lord to do evil in your life
by failing to fear him? This is the
command to fear Him reverently (Deut. 6:13; 10:20).
The fact is that there are two
kinds of believer, and these two kinds act differently based on how they perceive
the nature of Gd. Those that have no
fear in one examination were more likely to cheat. However, those that had fear did not cheat on
a test, when given a chance.
There are 613
commandments in the Torah, and it is that if one doesn’t keep or attempt to
keep all of them, then he or she is under a curse. Christians are usually aware of some of these
laws, but when it comes to the Ten Commandments, Christians that I know of say
that the command to keep the Sabbath is no longer legitimate. Let me tell you something: If you work out
your back seven days a week, it will be sore, and possibly even crippling, and
it is this way with so many other commandments that Christians seemingly do
away with, declaring them null and void for whatever reason. I try to separate myself from them.
Deuteronomy makes it
clear, you have to get your heart right with Gd and follow all His commands if
you are to prosper. If we worship the
Lord, and I don't mean Jesus, Deuteronomy is 100% clear that there is paradise
on earth for the obedient. Why
transgress the law and hope for grace, if you can be obedient and have goodness
multiplied.
Look at me! I am a creditor as I write this, and so is Blogspot! I am under no obligation to write at
all. My payment is received via the
spirit that the Lord grants to me because I am sharing freely what I know.
I have known of the
blessing and the curse in my own lifetime.
When I was told by God that He was punishing me, I was elated for
that. I just simply couldn’t love a God
that I didn’t fear and was told that I wasn’t required to fear, so I was an
atheist.
Which way are you going
to go? Most people I know believe that their Old Testament has been nullified,
but that is as stupid as a person who believes that he can will God out of
existence. It is not until fools stop blaming Satan for everything, and instead
focus on doing good deeds and repent that we will see heaven on earth!
Friday, October 5, 2012
The physics of the Light that guides creation_Metabolic Light that Guideth
Spiritually and physically, Light derives its power from both positive and negative power, so to is it this way with Gd. Gd is as the Light that presides over the cosmic battle between good and evil.
It is up to humankind to see that this occurs to creation, as Gd says, "Let them rule (humans)," and in addition our assistance is that Gd has given, Torah, which is entirely ecologically friendly, such that through Torah, Gd asks all of us to be environmental stewards, and we do this through our own light, metabolism. That we have light necessates that if we are alive that we have a special purpose, even at the animal level, where we rule over animals to see that good is accomplished.
The Role of Humankind
Physically and spiritually, one of the most profound ideas in this world is metabolism. That is, like a flame, we consume oxygen and digestible materials in order to shine light in this world. Animals too have this property that materials are consumed in order assist in providing the universe with light. It is up to humankind to see that this occurs to creation, as Gd says, "Let them rule (humans)," and in addition our assistance is that Gd has given, Torah, which is entirely ecologically friendly, such that through Torah, Gd asks all of us to be environmental stewards, and we do this through our own light, metabolism. That we have light necessates that if we are alive that we have a special purpose, even at the animal level, where we rule over animals to see that good is accomplished.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)