Noachide Jewish Moshiach Chabad Judaism Jew evolution creation mysticism Kabballah Tanya Torah 613 Mishneh Torah Ethics of the Fathers Pirkei Avot Muslim Qur'an Islam Ishmael Mohammed British Israelism Zeus Greek Mythology Persian Mythology Norwegian Mythology Christian House of David Messiah Mashiach Jesus Esau Edom Edomites Middle Ages medieval Maimonides Rashi The Lubavitcher Rebbe Sabbath Shabbat Talmud Koran New Testament Gospels Pauline polytheism idol worship USA Antediluvian
Friday, September 7, 2012
On Goodness and Philosophy
Philosophy often tries to answer the question: What is good. The moral absolutist in me wants to believe that the Torah is the primary text for rules for healthy living. Yet, the moral relativism in me knows that if I eat at my parents house the foods that are most likely clams, lobster, pork, or shrimp. Thus, it is such that when I go to my parents house we have a disagreement about what is good. I liken eating lobster to eating a cockroach, eating clams to eating earth worms, and eating pork to eating human. In fact, there are so many ways that parents try to suppress my intellectual freedom that my current resolution to deal with them is to avoid them.
Labels:
Christianity,
clams,
Judaism,
lobster,
moral absolutes,
moral relativism,
philosophy 101,
pork,
shrimp
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
No comments:
Post a Comment